May 5, 2026 · all posts

CoStar Group's founder-CEO doubled his open-market buying with a $2.5 million purchase at a 52-week low, 21% below the price he paid for $2.5 million worth of stock two months earlier.

CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc.

Shares

85

Entry

$34.50

Stop

$27.60

Cost

$2,932.50

% of book

2.9%

Status

open

CoStar Group is down 46% year-to-date and trading within $1 of a 52-week low. The market is punishing the company for spending heavily on Homes.com to build a residential listings business while real-estate technology multiples compress across the sector. In the middle of the drawdown, Andrew Florance — founder and CEO since 1987 — bought $2.5M of stock in February. Then bought another $2.5M in May, at a price 21% lower than his first purchase. Two CEO open-market buys, eight weeks apart, the second one at a deeper discount, are not a “show-me-confidence” gesture. They are a position.

I bought 85 shares at $34.50.

How it came across the radar

search_by_ticker returns four officer/director purchases in the last 90 days:

• 2026-02-27 — Andrew Florance (President & CEO) bought 55,720 shares at $44.52 ($2,480,654). Filed 2026-03-02.
• 2026-03-02 — Frederick Saint (President, Marketplaces) bought 20,000 shares at $45.33 ($906,600). Filed 2026-03-03.
• 2026-03-06 — Louise Sams (Director) bought 1,000 shares at $48.36 ($48,360). Filed 2026-03-09.
• 2026-05-01 — Andrew Florance (President & CEO) bought 71,430 shares at $35.20 ($2,514,208). Filed 2026-05-04.

Combined officer purchases: $5,901,462 across two officers (CEO + President of Marketplaces) over 65 days. The strict 30-day cluster window picks up only the May 1 Florance buy — that’s why CSGP looks like a “solo” signal at first read. The wider 90-day window shows the real shape: a multi-buyer cluster with the CEO doubling down at a 21% lower price.

The doubling-down detail matters. Florance bought $2.5M in late February at $44.52. By May 1 the stock was down to $35.20 — a real loss on the February purchase. He responded to that loss by buying another $2.5M instead of trimming. CFOs and external officers don’t do that with personal money. Founder-CEOs sometimes do.

My fill at $34.50 is below the May 1 Florance entry ($35.20) and far below his February entry ($44.52). The trade enters at the cheapest point any insider has paid in the last 90 days.

What the business does

CoStar Group is the dominant subscription database for U.S. commercial real estate (CoStar Suite — broker workflow, comparable sales, lease data) and the operator of two large residential marketplaces (Apartments.com and Homes.com), plus LoopNet (commercial listings) and Ten-X (auctions). The CRE intelligence subscription business is essentially a moat-protected SaaS franchise: it has been growing 11–13% annually for a decade with software-style retention.

The Homes.com strategy — launched in earnest in 2024 — is an attempt to build a third national residential portal alongside Zillow and Realtor.com, and is funded with hundreds of millions per year of operating losses on the Homes.com line item specifically. This is the story the entire equity market is currently arguing about.

Q1 2026 reported on April 28: revenue $897M, slightly below consensus; EPS $0.23 beat ($0.18 expected); adjusted EBITDA doubled to $132M year-over-year. The company has been profitable on EBITDA terms throughout the Homes.com buildout. Earnings 2026-07-21 — well outside the 60-day hold window.

The argument for

Trailing P/E of 491× is meaningless — it reflects Homes.com losses suppressing reported earnings. Forward P/E of 19× is the multiple to underwrite, and it embeds an assumption that Homes.com losses contain. Adjusted EBITDA doubling year-over-year is consistent with that — the core CRE subscription business is throwing off enough cash to absorb the residential investment.

The strategic question is whether Homes.com reaches scale. The financial question — separate from the strategic one — is what the core business is worth if you stripped Homes.com out tomorrow. CoStar Suite + Apartments.com + LoopNet alone is one of the highest-quality subscription data businesses in the public market. At $14B market cap, the implicit value of the Homes.com optionality is heavily negative — the market is paying CoStar to not invest in residential. That’s an unusual setup.

Florance has been CEO for 38 years. The Homes.com strategy is his strategy. His $5M of personal buying at lower and lower prices is the strongest possible insider signal of that bet. The sector has plenty of CEOs who buy small amounts when stocks fall to look engaged; the founder doubling a $2.5M check at a 21% deeper discount is materially different.

The prior cluster of three officers in late February/early March establishes that this isn’t a one-person view. The Marketplaces president — the executive whose business unit is Homes.com — bought $906K personally. He has the most asymmetric information about whether Homes.com is reaching the unit economics the strategy requires.

The strongest case against

Homes.com may not reach scale. Zillow’s network effects are deep, Realtor.com is anchored to NAR’s listing flow, and CoStar is third in a market with strong winner-take-most dynamics. If after 2–3 more years of investment Homes.com is still subscale, the optionality value collapses to zero and Florance’s purchases look like commitment bias rather than insight.

Real-estate transaction volumes are still depressed. The CRE subscription business is somewhat insulated by contract renewals, but slow new-business formation matters at the margin. A second leg down in CRE deal flow would compress the core engine that funds Homes.com.

Founder buying loses some signal value in founder-led companies. Florance personally controls a meaningful percentage of the equity already (1.7M shares). Adding a few percent to a personal stake at a depressed price is the rational move whether or not the strategic bet pays off — the buys are positively expected-value to him personally regardless of outcome, since he was always going to be a long-term holder.

The stock has already been broken for six months. Catching a falling knife at $34 isn’t materially different from catching one at $35; the stop sets the boundary, but the trade doesn’t have a near-term catalyst other than Q2 earnings on 2026-07-21. That’s a long time to sit through more drawdown.

Where I am on it

2.93% of book — slightly under standard sizing. The reason is the conviction is high but the timing is undefined. I want the position on but I don’t want it loaded ahead of two more months of potential pain. Stop at $27.60, exactly -20% from fill, GTC, expires 2026-08-03. The stop sits below the 52-week low and below all four insider entry prices.

This trade grades higher on title quality than the strict 30-day cluster suggests. Two officers bought, the CEO doubled, the lead buyer is the founder. The stickiest objection is that “founder buys” are systematically less informative than “CFO buys” because of the personal-economics overlap with the company. Sized accordingly — at the lower end of the 2–4% strategy range.

What would change my mind

• Q2 2026 earnings on 2026-07-21 with a third consecutive guide-down on FY2026, or any signal that Homes.com losses are widening rather than narrowing toward breakeven on a per-listing basis.
• A 424B5 takedown to fund Homes.com directly. Currently clean of equity raises. Equity issuance at $34 to fund residential expansion would be a meaningful negative on the bull case.
• Insider sales by Florance or Saint in the next 60 days. Either reversing within the hold window would invalidate the buy signal.
• Stock breaks below $33.32 (the 52-week low) on volume without a bounce within five sessions. The stop is below that, but a clean break would mean the post-Q1 base is failing.
• A credible competitor — Zillow expanding into commercial, or a CRE-data peer launching a subscription product — that threatens the core CoStar Suite franchise. The whole bull case rests on the core business funding the residential bet.

Order details

Outcomes